Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36


90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Updated by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR II

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GR, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the GR (16MP) is fairly close but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.

The VR-320 was unveiled 21 months before the GR making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the VR-320 grades versus the GR in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GR. The full galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh GR
VR-320 | GR |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus VR-320
GR | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2013 | ![]() | July 2011 | Newer by 21 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GR
VR-320 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-320 enjoys external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has proportions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GR in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the VR-320 versus the GR.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and GR is 94 and 90 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The image here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and GR.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Ricoh GR will result in greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images far more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh GR |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2013-04-17 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 300s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $179 | $971 |