Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3f30/e3f308a0d9434d86db129d3a675997be5821abbe" alt="Ricoh GR III front Ricoh GR III front"
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh GR III
- Updated by Ricoh GR III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and GR III (24MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The VR-320 was brought out 8 years prior to the GR III which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the VR-320 matches up versus the GR III for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GR III. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh GR III
VR-320 | GR III |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus VR-320
GR III | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2018 | ![]() | July 2011 | More modern by 87 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GR III
VR-320 | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 provides exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh GR III has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
See the Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the VR-320 against the GR III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca89b/ca89b4d70a6339227bf1f4dc762340a911bddc99" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and GR III is 94 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb760/bb76098ee413058b45b9b1a7ef067572f5e039ff" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by checking specs. The image below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and GR III.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The VR-320 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Ricoh GR III will give extra detail having its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d0ca/5d0ca2a8c83c4b4cb92b5b579a9ccb864bdcdd00" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58699/5869937256e05bd727e11b31871b608be0b8a4df" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh GR III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh GR III |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2018-09-25 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-16 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 6cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lb) | 257 grams (0.57 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $179 | $900 |