Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is pretty similar but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) come with different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-320 was launched 21 months after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the VR-320 grades vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
VR-320 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | November 2009 | More modern by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus VR-320
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
VR-320 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 offers exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the VR-320 compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 94 and 77 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The VR-320 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Olympus VR-320 will offer greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more recent VR-320 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lb) | 453 grams (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $179 | $566 |