Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed July 2011
  • Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Released November 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is pretty similar but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) come with different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The VR-320 was launched 21 months after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the VR-320 grades vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 VR-320 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
ReleasedJuly 2011November 2009More modern by 21 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus VR-320

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro VR-320 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 VR-320 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 offers exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Examine the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the VR-320 compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 94 and 77 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

To sum up, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The VR-320 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Olympus VR-320 will offer greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more recent VR-320 should have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography factors
33
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
55
focusing manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no liveview feature
resolution not great (12MP)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Street photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Street photography highlights
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
62
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography features
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography features
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
32
nice sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
no liveview feature
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
bad battery power (320 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Travel photography info
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography info
70
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
megapixel count good (14MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
49
built-in flash
bad battery power (320 CIPA)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography features
42
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
46
focusing manually
screen size is good (3 inch)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12MP)
bad battery power (320 shots)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Vlogging advice
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging advice
32
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone port
20
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Olympus VR-320Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus VR-320 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2011-07-19 2009-11-10
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III GR engine III
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4288 x 2848
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 50mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.5
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 180 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 158 grams (0.35 lb) 453 grams (1.00 lb)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 320 photos
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $179 $566