Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Revealed March 2010
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") have different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VR-320 was released 17 months after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the VR-320 scores versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
VR-320 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | March 2010 | Newer by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus VR-320
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
VR-320 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 features external dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the VR-320 against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 94 and 85 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions only by going through specifications. The pic below will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
To sum up, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will show more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher VR-320 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 355 gr (0.78 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $179 | $349 |