Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • Successor is Olympus VR-330
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Revealed March 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") have different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The VR-320 was released 17 months after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the VR-320 scores versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 VR-320 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
RevealedJuly 2011March 2010Newer by 17 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus VR-320

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC VR-320 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 VR-320 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurement
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 features external dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Examine the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the VR-320 against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 94 and 85 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

Often, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions only by going through specifications. The pic below will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

To sum up, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will show more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher VR-320 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography info
33
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
comes with face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
36
you can focus manually
supports RAW files
no liveview feature
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Street photography highlights
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography highlights
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158g)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
lighter than others (355g)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography info
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no liveview feature
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
has no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Travel photography factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography factors
70
lighter than average in class (158g)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
60
lighter than others (355g)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography factors
42
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
47
you can focus manually
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Vlogging factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging factors
32
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone support
28
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (355 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Olympus VR-320Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus VR-320 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2011-07-19 2010-03-18
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 180s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate - 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.70 m 4.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 gr (0.35 lb) 355 gr (0.78 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 410 pictures
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $179 $349