Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
  • New Model is Olympus VR-330
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Announced June 2010
  • Additionally Known as WB650
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

Lets look much closer at the Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is very comparable and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The VR-320 was released 14 months later than the HZ35W making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the VR-320 matches up versus the HZ35W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Samsung HZ35W

 VR-320 HZ35W 
AnnouncedJuly 2011June 2010Fresher by 14 months

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus VR-320

 HZ35W VR-320 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Display resolution614k230kClearer display (+384k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Samsung HZ35W

 VR-320 HZ35W 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurements
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VR-320 has outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Check out the Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the VR-320 vs the HZ35W.

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and HZ35W is 94 and 91 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing specs. The photograph here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and HZ35W.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus VR-320 to provide extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more modern VR-320 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Portrait photography camera
33
megapixel count good (14MP)
has face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
34
has manual focus
has face detect focusing
cannot use external flash
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Street photography info
Samsung HZ35W Street photography info
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (245g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography features
Samsung HZ35W Sports photography features
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
42
great zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking focus
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Travel photography camera
70
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
missing Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
63
lighter than average in class (245 grams)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great zoom (360mm)
no Timelapse function
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Landscape photography camera
42
decently wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
43
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus VR-320
Vlogging with Samsung HZ35W
32
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone jack
31
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
lighter than average in class (245g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Samsung HZ35W
 Olympus VR-320Samsung HZ35W
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus VR-320 Samsung HZ35W
Also Known as - WB650
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2011-07-19 2010-06-16
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 24-360mm (15.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus distance 1cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.70 m 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 grams (0.35 pounds) 245 grams (0.54 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model LI-42B SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $179 $300