Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Additionally Known as WB650
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is very comparable and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe VR-320 was released 14 months later than the HZ35W making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the VR-320 matches up versus the HZ35W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 and Samsung HZ35W. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Samsung HZ35W
VR-320 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2011 | June 2010 | Fresher by 14 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus VR-320
HZ35W | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Samsung HZ35W
VR-320 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VR-320 has outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the VR-320 vs the HZ35W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and HZ35W is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing specs. The photograph here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and HZ35W.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus VR-320 to provide extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more modern VR-320 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Samsung HZ35W |
Also Known as | - | WB650 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-07-19 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $179 | $300 |