Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma SD10

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Sigma SD10 front
Portability
54
Imaging
39
Features
27
Overall
34

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
  • Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Sigma SD10
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 800 (Bump to 1600)
  • 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
  • Released March 2004
  • Superseded the Sigma SD9
  • Renewed by Sigma SD14
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma SD10 Overview

The following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus VR-320 versus Sigma SD10, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The VR-320 was brought out 7 years after the SD10 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summation of how the VR-320 grades against the SD10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

				

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sigma SD10

 VR-320 SD10 
ReleasedJuly 2011March 2004Newer by 90 months
Screen dimension3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution230k130kCrisper screen (+100k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Olympus VR-320

 SD10 VR-320 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sigma SD10

 VR-320 SD10 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-320 provides exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD10 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus VR-320 versus Sigma SD10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the VR-320 and the SD10.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma SD10 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and SD10 is 94 and 54 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma SD10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The picture below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and SD10.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus VR-320 will offer you extra detail having its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent VR-320 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma SD10 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma SD10 as a Portrait photography camera
33
decent MP (14 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
47
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
low resolution sensor (3 megapixels)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Street photography camera
Sigma SD10 as a Street photography camera
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (158g)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
43
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (950g)
low max ISO (800)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography information
Sigma SD10 Sports photography information
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
36
maximum shutter speed is high (1/6,000 seconds)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (3MP)
has no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
Travel photography with Sigma SD10
70
lighter than competition (158 grams)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
29
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (950 grams)
low resolution sensor (3MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography info
Sigma SD10 Landscape photography info
42
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
41
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
tiny screen (1.8 inch)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (3 megapixels)
low max ISO (800)
no Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus VR-320
Vlogging with Sigma SD10
32
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
lighter than competition (158 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic support
9
lack of video recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Sigma SD10
 Olympus VR-320Sigma SD10
General Information
Make Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus VR-320 Sigma SD10
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Released 2011-07-19 2004-03-19
Physical type Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 3 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 2268 x 1512
Maximum native ISO 1600 800
Maximum boosted ISO - 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) -
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 1.8"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 130k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 98 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.77x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/6000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.70 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 158g (0.35 pounds) 950g (2.09 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC Compact Flash Type I or II
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $179 $198