Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX5
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
92 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX5 Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX5, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and HX5 (10MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and HX5 (1/2.4") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VR-320 was manufactured 14 months later than the HX5 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the VR-320 grades versus the HX5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Sony HX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony HX5
VR-320 | HX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | June 2010 | More recent by 14 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX5 over the Olympus VR-320
HX5 | VR-320 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony HX5
VR-320 | HX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 comes with outside dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony HX5 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the VR-320 versus the HX5.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and HX5 is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by researching specifications. The photograph below should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and HX5.
Plainly, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The VR-320 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will render extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger VR-320 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX5 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) | 200 grams (0.44 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, optional SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $179 | $275 |