Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T99

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
27
Overall
33

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T99 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Sony T99
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
  • 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
  • Introduced July 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T99 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T99, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the T99 (14MP) is very close and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The VR-320 was revealed 13 months after the T99 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony T99 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the VR-320 matches up vs the T99 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony T99

 VR-320 T99 
IntroducedJuly 2011July 2010More modern by 13 months

Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Olympus VR-320

 T99 VR-320 
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony T99

 VR-320 T99 
Focus manually No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 offers external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony T99 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T99 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the VR-320 versus the T99.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T99 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and T99 is 94 and 96 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T99 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The image below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and T99.

As you can see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of images although you will need to take the age of the cameras into account. The newer VR-320 provides an edge in sensor technology.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T99 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus VR-320
Portrait photography with Sony T99
33
megapixel count good (14MP)
provides face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
28
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Street photography info
Sony T99 Street photography info
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (158g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
57
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VR-320
Sports photography with Sony T99
47
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
35
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14MP)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,250s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Travel photography information
Sony T99 Travel photography information
70
lighter than competition (158g)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
65
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
lack of Timelapse function
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography features
Sony T99 Landscape photography features
42
decently wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
42
pretty wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Vlogging features
Sony T99 Vlogging features
32
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
lighter than competition (158g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone jack
31
pretty wide (25mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony T99 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Sony T99
 Olympus VR-320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus VR-320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Announced 2011-07-19 2010-07-08
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.5-4.6
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 2s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1250s
Continuous shutter speed - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 4.60 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 158 grams (0.35 lbs) 121 grams (0.27 lbs)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LI-42B NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $179 $179