Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W330

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 front
Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W330 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Sony W330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 128g - 96 x 57 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W330 Overview

Here, we are reviewing the Olympus VR-320 and Sony W330, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the W330 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The VR-320 was announced 19 months later than the W330 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony W330 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the VR-320 grades versus the W330 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony W330

 VR-320 W330 
IntroducedJuly 2011January 2010More recent by 19 months

Reasons to pick Sony W330 over the Olympus VR-320

 W330 VR-320 

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony W330

 VR-320 W330 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W330 Physical Comparison

When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 has got outside dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony W330 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

Look at the Olympus VR-320 and Sony W330 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the VR-320 and the W330.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W330 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and W330 is 94 and 96 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W330 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at specifications. The visual here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and W330.

To sum up, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of images but you should really factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The younger VR-320 should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W330 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography advice
Sony W330 Portrait photography advice
33
megapixel count decent (14MP)
provides face detect focusing
no manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
28
MP count good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Street photography details
Sony W330 Street photography details
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (158g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
48
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VR-320
Sports photography with Sony W330
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
26
MP count good (14MP)
slow fps (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Travel photography details
Sony W330 Travel photography details
70
lighter than others (158 grams)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
no Time Lapse mode
does not have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
65
MP count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not posses selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography info
Sony W330 Landscape photography info
42
reasonably wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
37
fairly wide (26mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
MP count good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Vlogging advice
Sony W330 Vlogging advice
32
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
lighter than others (158 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic socket
26
fairly wide (26mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
does not posses selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Sony W330
 Olympus VR-320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus VR-320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Announced 2011-07-19 2010-01-07
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance 1cm 4cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 2s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1600s
Continuous shutter rate - 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.70 m 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158g (0.35 lbs) 128g (0.28 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 96 x 57 x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model LI-42B NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $179 $170