Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ35
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ38
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic FZ35, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is very well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VR-330 was revealed 8 months after the FZ35 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the VR-330 matches up vs the FZ35 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-330 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Panasonic FZ35
| VR-330 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2011 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 8 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus VR-330
| FZ35 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic FZ35
| VR-330 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-330 provides external dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ35 has proportions of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") along with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VR-330 and Panasonic FZ35 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the VR-330 versus the FZ35.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-330 and FZ35 is 94 and 72 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by looking at specs. The pic here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-330 and FZ35.
All in all, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-330 to give greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The fresher VR-330 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus VR-330 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-4.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 8.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) | 397 gr (0.88 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $220 | $999 |
