Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2012
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is relatively similar but the VR-330 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe VR-330 was revealed 11 months prior to the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the VR-330 matches up vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
VR-330 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus VR-330
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | February 2011 | More modern by 11 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
VR-330 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus VR-330 has outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has specifications of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the VR-330 and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 94 and 69 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by going over specifications. The image here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-330 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The VR-330 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VR-330 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2011-02-08 | 2012-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lb) | 550 grams (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $220 | $871 |