Clicky

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37
Olympus VR-330 front
 
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
45
Overall
52

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs

Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced February 2011
  • Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Revealed February 2012
Photography Glossary

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview

Following is a extended overview of the Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is relatively similar but the VR-330 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The VR-330 was revealed 11 months prior to the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the VR-330 matches up vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 VR-330 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus VR-330

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 VR-330 
RevealedFebruary 2012February 2011More modern by 11 months
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 VR-330 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus VR-330 has outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has specifications of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).

Check out the Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the VR-330 and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 94 and 69 respectively.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by going over specifications. The image here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-330 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

To sum up, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The VR-330 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus VR-330
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
33
good resolution (14MP)
offers face detection focusing
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
74
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
has face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Street photography camera
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
55
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (550 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography highlights
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
48
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
lack of phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Travel photography features
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography features
70
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
good resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
59
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
heavier than competition in class (550 grams)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography features
42
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
63
focusing manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Vlogging features
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging features
32
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focusing
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone port
24
reasonably wide (24mm)
has face detection autofocus
slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic jack
heavier than competition in class (550 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
 Olympus VR-330Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus VR-330 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2011-02-08 2012-02-02
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4928 x 3264
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 200
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 24-85mm (3.5x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology TFT Color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 180 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.70 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 grams (0.35 lb) 550 grams (1.21 lb)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 400 photos
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $220 $871