Clicky

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh PX

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37
Olympus VR-330 front
 
Ricoh PX front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs

Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced February 2011
  • Replaced the Olympus VR-320
Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Released August 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh PX Overview

Here is a thorough overview of the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh PX, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the PX (16MP) is very well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The VR-330 was revealed 6 months before the PX and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the VR-330 grades vs the PX with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Ricoh PX

 VR-330 PX 
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Olympus VR-330

 PX VR-330 
Manually focus Dial precise focus

Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh PX

 VR-330 PX 
ReleasedFebruary 2011August 2011Similar age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-330 comes with physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh PX has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).

Check out the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh PX in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the VR-330 versus the PX.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh PX size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and PX is 94 and 95 respectively.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at technical specs. The visual below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-330 and PX.

As you can tell, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh PX to resolve greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a little more aggressively.

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh PX as a Portrait photography camera
33
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
offers face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
43
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
comes with face detection autofocus
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Street photography advice
Ricoh PX Street photography advice
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (158 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Sports photography factors
Ricoh PX Sports photography factors
47
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proof
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VR-330
Travel photography with Ricoh PX
70
lighter than competition (158 grams)
good megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
68
environment proof
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography details
Ricoh PX Landscape photography details
42
quite wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
47
has manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
environment proof
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.7 inch)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Vlogging info
Ricoh PX Vlogging info
32
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focusing
lighter than competition (158g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone support
31
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh PX Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh PX
 Olympus VR-330Ricoh PX
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus VR-330 Ricoh PX
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2011-02-08 2011-08-16
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3072
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.9-5.4
Macro focusing range 1cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 158 grams (0.35 lb) 156 grams (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LI-42B DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $220 $329