Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-6
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is fairly similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VR-330 was unveiled 5 years prior to the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the VR-330 scores against the WG-5 GPS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-330 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The full galleries are available at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| VR-330 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus VR-330
| WG-5 GPS | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | February 2011 | Fresher by 48 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| VR-330 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-330 has got exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the VR-330 and the WG-5 GPS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and WG-5 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading specifications. The photograph here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-330 and WG-5 GPS.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to offer you more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older VR-330 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Portrait photography factors
decent MP (14 megapixels)
offers face detect focus
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
includes face detection autofocus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Olympus VR-330 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-5 GPS as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (158g)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than others in class (236 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus VR-330
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
weather sealing
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low battery pack (240 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Olympus VR-330 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-5 GPS as a Travel photography camera
lighter than others (158 grams)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
weather sealing
good resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
low battery pack (240 CIPA)
more heavy than others in class (236 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography features
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Landscape photography features
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
focusing manually
decently wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
weather sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
low battery pack (240 per charge)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging factors
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Vlogging factors
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focus
lighter than others (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic support
decently wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external microphone socket
more heavy than others in class (236g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus VR-330 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 14.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 236 gr (0.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $220 | $500 |