Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung CL5
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Announced February 2009
- Also Known as PL10
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung CL5 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus VR-330 versus Samsung CL5, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") have totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VR-330 was brought out 24 months later than the CL5 making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the VR-330 scores against the CL5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-330 and Samsung CL5. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Samsung CL5
| VR-330 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2011 | February 2009 | Fresher by 24 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Olympus VR-330
| CL5 | VR-330 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung CL5
| VR-330 | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-330 features exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL5 has sizing of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Olympus VR-330 versus Samsung CL5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the VR-330 and the CL5.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and CL5 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by going through a spec sheet. The photograph here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-330 and CL5.
As you can see, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The VR-330 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus VR-330 will provide extra detail having its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The younger VR-330 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Samsung CL5 |
| Also called as | - | PL10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2011-02-08 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lb) | 141 grams (0.31 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $220 | $391 |