Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung HZ10W
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d771b/d771b66d884c4e557825e4da5dca0dcce000b804" alt="Samsung HZ10W front Samsung HZ10W front"
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Launched May 2009
- Also Known as WB500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung HZ10W, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and HZ10W (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The VR-330 was revealed 22 months later than the HZ10W which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the VR-330 matches up versus the HZ10W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-330 and Samsung HZ10W. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Samsung HZ10W
VR-330 | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2011 | ![]() | May 2009 | More recent by 22 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Olympus VR-330
HZ10W | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung HZ10W
VR-330 | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-330 has got external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung HZ10W has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung HZ10W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the VR-330 compared to the HZ10W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dddfa/dddfab90e4510a93f92b215e5cb929929b9aed14" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung HZ10W size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung HZ10W size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and HZ10W is 94 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8f63/d8f632a64721f98561ff9f8e07cb5f8535fc5fec" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung HZ10W top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung HZ10W top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by checking out technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-330 and HZ10W.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Olympus VR-330 to produce extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The younger VR-330 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/324fa/324fa512b0524276722658d88e99e06a5dc039ab" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung HZ10W sensor size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung HZ10W sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69988/6998812e4a33b0540454fdbc75c1f11a3241cb0e" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Samsung HZ10W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Samsung HZ10W |
Also referred to as | - | WB500 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-02-08 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2432 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 lbs) | 249g (0.55 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $220 | $300 |