Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX300
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Older Model is Samsung NX210
- Replacement is Samsung NX500
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Olympus VR-330 versus Samsung NX300, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe VR-330 was released 3 years before the NX300 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the VR-330 grades vs the NX300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-330 and Samsung NX300. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Samsung NX300
VR-330 | NX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus VR-330
NX300 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2013 | February 2011 | Fresher by 34 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 768k | 460k | Crisper screen (+308k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung NX300
VR-330 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-330 offers exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung NX300 has dimensions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-330 versus Samsung NX300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the VR-330 compared to the NX300.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and NX300 is 94 and 86 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by researching technical specs. The visual underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-330 and NX300.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The VR-330 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung NX300 will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older VR-330 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Samsung NX300 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2013-11-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 768 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) | 331 grams (0.73 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $220 | $750 |