Clicky

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung PL200

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37
Olympus VR-330 front
 
Samsung PL200 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
22
Overall
31

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs

Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Superseded the Olympus VR-320
Samsung PL200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released July 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung PL200 Overview

In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus VR-330 versus Samsung PL200, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The VR-330 was revealed 7 months later than the PL200 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the VR-330 matches up against the PL200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Samsung PL200

 VR-330 PL200 
ReleasedFebruary 2011July 2010More recent by 7 months
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Olympus VR-330

 PL200 VR-330 

Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung PL200

 VR-330 PL200 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-330 features physical measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL200 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).

Compare the Olympus VR-330 versus Samsung PL200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the VR-330 and the PL200.

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung PL200 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-330 and PL200 is 94 and 94 respectively.

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung PL200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-330 and PL200.

As you can see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of files although you really should consider the production date of the cameras into account. The newer VR-330 should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung PL200 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography advice
Samsung PL200 Portrait photography advice
33
decent MP (14MP)
offers face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
28
decent megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus VR-330
Street photography with Samsung PL200
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (158 grams)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VR-330
Sports photography with Samsung PL200
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
38
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Travel photography advice
Samsung PL200 Travel photography advice
70
lighter than average (158g)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
58
decent megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography features
Samsung PL200 Landscape photography features
42
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
37
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Vlogging information
Samsung PL200 Vlogging information
32
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
lighter than average (158g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone socket
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have microphone jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-330 and Samsung PL200
 Olympus VR-330Samsung PL200
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus VR-330 Samsung PL200
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2011-02-08 2010-07-21
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 31-217mm (7.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.3-5.5
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 4.60 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 158 grams (0.35 lb) 170 grams (0.37 lb)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LI-42B BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $220 $0