Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL240
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally referred to as ST5000
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL240, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is very comparable and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VR-330 was revealed 14 months after the TL240 making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the VR-330 scores vs the TL240 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-330 & Samsung TL240. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Samsung TL240
VR-330 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | January 2010 | More modern by 14 months | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Olympus VR-330
TL240 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung TL240
VR-330 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-330 features physical measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL240 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the VR-330 and the TL240.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-330 and TL240 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor sizes only by going through technical specs. The pic here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-330 and TL240.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of images although you should take the launch date of the cameras into account. The more modern VR-330 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Samsung TL240 |
Other name | - | ST5000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2011-02-08 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4334 x 3256 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $220 | $171 |