Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung WB350F
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2014
Photography Glossary Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VR-330 was brought out 3 years before the WB350F which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the VR-330 scores against the WB350F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-330 & Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Samsung WB350F
| VR-330 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus VR-330
| WB350F | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | February 2011 | Newer by 35 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung WB350F
| VR-330 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-330 provides exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-330 and Samsung WB350F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the VR-330 and the WB350F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and WB350F is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The image here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-330 and WB350F.
Clearly, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB350F to give more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged VR-330 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus VR-330 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Olympus VR-330 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VR-330 | Samsung WB350F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158g (0.35 lbs) | 276g (0.61 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $220 | $260 |