Clicky

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony RX1R II

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37
Olympus VR-330 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II front
Portability
78
Imaging
76
Features
65
Overall
71

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs

Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched February 2011
  • Older Model is Olympus VR-320
Sony RX1R II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 50 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
  • Revealed October 2015
  • Older Model is Sony RX1R
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony RX1R II Overview

Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus VR-330 vs Sony RX1R II, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the VR-330 (14MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the VR-330 (1/2.3") and RX1R II (Full frame) offer different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The VR-330 was brought out 5 years earlier than the RX1R II and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the VR-330 scores versus the RX1R II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Sony RX1R II

 VR-330 RX1R II 

Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Olympus VR-330

 RX1R II VR-330 
RevealedOctober 2015February 2011Fresher by 56 months
Manual focus More exact focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1229k460kClearer display (+769k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Sony RX1R II

 VR-330 RX1R II 
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-330 offers external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony RX1R II has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") with a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).

See the Olympus VR-330 vs Sony RX1R II in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the VR-330 against the RX1R II.

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony RX1R II size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-330 and RX1R II is 94 and 78 respectively.

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony RX1R II top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing only by reviewing specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-330 and RX1R II.

To sum up, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The VR-330 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX1R II will offer more detail having its extra 28MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older VR-330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony RX1R II sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography features
Sony RX1R II Portrait photography features
33
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
includes face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
85
you can focus manually
flash sync is higher than normal (1/4,000s)
MP count great (42MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
supports face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus VR-330
Street photography with Sony RX1R II
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158g)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
73
screen tilts
big sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
good ISO range (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (507g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Sports photography factors
Sony RX1R II Sports photography factors
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
includes tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
63
MP count great (42 megapixels)
big sensor size (Full frame)
supports tracking focus
supports phase detect autofocus
focal length is fixed (35mm)
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
terrible battery power (220 shots)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VR-330
Travel photography with Sony RX1R II
70
lighter than average in class (158g)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
lack of Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
59
MP count great (42MP)
good max aperture (f2.0)
lack of Time Lapse recording
terrible battery power (220 per charge)
heavier than competition in class (507 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography advice
Sony RX1R II Landscape photography advice
42
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
68
you can focus manually
good max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3")
MP count great (42 megapixels)
big sensor size (Full frame)
does not have anti-alias filter
good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (35mm)
lack of image stabilization
terrible battery power (220 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-330 as a Vlogging camera
Sony RX1R II as a Vlogging camera
32
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
lighter than average in class (158g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone socket
34
good max aperture (f2.0)
supports face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with mic jack
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (507 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-330 vs Sony RX1R II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-330 and Sony RX1R II
 Olympus VR-330Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus VR-330 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2011-02-08 2015-10-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III BIONZ X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 42 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 7952 x 5304
Max native ISO 1600 25600
Max boosted ISO - 102400
Lowest native ISO 80 50
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 25
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 35mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.0
Macro focusing range 1cm 14cm
Crop factor 5.8 1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of display 460k dot 1,229k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.70 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 158 grams (0.35 pounds) 507 grams (1.12 pounds)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 97
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 25.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.9
DXO Low light rating not tested 3204
Other
Battery life - 220 photos
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-42B NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2,5, 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $220 $3,300