Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic G95
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Released April 2019
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-G90
- Earlier Model is Panasonic G85
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic G95 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic G95, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and G95 (20.3MP) and the VR-340 (1/2.3") and G95 (Four Thirds) have different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VR-340 was unveiled 8 years prior to the G95 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the VR-340 matches up versus the G95 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-340 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-340 Gallery and Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Panasonic G95
VR-340 | G95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Olympus VR-340
G95 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2019 | January 2012 | More recent by 88 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 460k | Sharper screen (+780k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Panasonic G95
VR-340 | G95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-340 features exterior dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Panasonic G95 has dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") with a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic G95 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the VR-340 versus the G95.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VR-340 and G95 is 96 and 67 respectively.
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements just by reading a spec sheet. The visual below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-340 and G95.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The VR-340 using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Panasonic G95 will deliver greater detail having an extra 4.3MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older VR-340 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-340 vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Olympus VR-340 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VR-340 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2019-04-05 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20.3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.80 m | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 lb) | 536g (1.18 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $130 | $998 |