Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax Q-S1
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f15c/0f15c591df6691d1385fd9ef9a58f17d9653b4b3" alt="Olympus VR-340 front Olympus VR-340 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Announced August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus VR-340 and Pentax Q-S1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the VR-340 (1/2.3") and Q-S1 (1/1.7") possess different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The VR-340 was revealed 3 years before the Q-S1 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the VR-340 matches up versus the Q-S1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-340 & Pentax Q-S1. The full galleries are available at Olympus VR-340 Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Pentax Q-S1
VR-340 | Q-S1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus VR-340
Q-S1 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 31 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Pentax Q-S1
VR-340 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-340 enjoys external dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Pentax Q-S1 has proportions of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VR-340 and Pentax Q-S1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the VR-340 vs the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86a9b/86a9b1dcff1caff0166da20264325569fc0f77d8" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VR-340 and Q-S1 is 96 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994e3/994e388394341d5c6ac5bad4687f2336c21743a0" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing specifications. The photograph below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-340 and Q-S1.
To sum up, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The VR-340 using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus VR-340 will offer more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The older VR-340 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3881b/3881b72743c5fa3dcdc2e96a828d4ee2df626b1e" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fefcd/fefcdbe76c7c61fd8543f921e13fe372a653d4f7" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Olympus VR-340 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus VR-340 | Pentax Q-S1 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2014-08-04 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.80 m | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 203 gr (0.45 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $130 | $250 |