Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh CX2
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh CX2, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VR-340 was unveiled 2 years later than the CX2 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the VR-340 scores vs the CX2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh CX2. The full galleries are available at Olympus VR-340 Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Ricoh CX2
| VR-340 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus VR-340
| CX2 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh CX2
| VR-340 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-340 offers external measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-340 and Ricoh CX2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the VR-340 and the CX2.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-340 and CX2 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by going over specs. The visual below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-340 and CX2.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-340 to offer you more detail having an extra 7MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics more aggressively. The more recent VR-340 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus VR-340 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus VR-340 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VR-340 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2009-08-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 pounds) | 185g (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-50B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $130 | $341 |