Clicky

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung DV150F

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Olympus VR-340 front
 
Samsung DV150F front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
29
Overall
35

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs

Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2012
Samsung DV150F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
  • 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung DV150F Overview

The following is a thorough overview of the Olympus VR-340 and Samsung DV150F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the VR-340 (16MP) and the DV150F (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The VR-340 was launched 12 months before the DV150F so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the VR-340 scores against the DV150F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Samsung DV150F

 VR-340 DV150F 
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Olympus VR-340

 DV150F VR-340 
RevealedJanuary 2013January 2012Newer by 12 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Samsung DV150F

 VR-340 DV150F 
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution460k460kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-340 has got external dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung DV150F has dimensions of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus VR-340 and Samsung DV150F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the VR-340 compared to the DV150F.

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung DV150F size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VR-340 and DV150F is 96 and 96 respectively.

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung DV150F top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading through technical specs. The picture here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-340 and DV150F.

As you have seen, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution so you should expect similar quality of photos though you might want to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The more aged VR-340 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung DV150F sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-340 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung DV150F as a Portrait photography camera
34
decent MP (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
34
decent MP (16 megapixels)
offers face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Street photography details
Samsung DV150F Street photography details
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (125 grams)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
56
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Sports photography details
Samsung DV150F Sports photography details
44
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
includes tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
36
decent MP (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VR-340
Travel photography with Samsung DV150F
69
lighter than competition (125 grams)
decent MP (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
69
lighter than competition in class (116g)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
missing Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung DV150F Landscape photography highlights
43
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
34
really wide (25mm)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
small screen (2.7")
no manual control
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Vlogging info
Samsung DV150F Vlogging info
33
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
lighter than competition (125 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic port
31
really wide (25mm)
has touchscreen
offers face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung DV150F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-340 and Samsung DV150F
 Olympus VR-340Samsung DV150F
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus VR-340 Samsung DV150F
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-01-10 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-240mm (10.0x) 25-125mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-5.7 f/2.5-6.3
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech TFT Color LCD Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.80 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125 grams (0.28 pounds) 116 grams (0.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model LI-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $130 $150