Clicky

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony T900

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Olympus VR-340 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
30
Overall
33

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony T900 Overview

Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus VR-340 and Sony T900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The VR-340 was released 2 years later than the T900 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving through a full comparison, below is a quick overview of how the VR-340 matches up against the T900 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Sony T900

 VR-340 T900 
IntroducedJanuary 2012February 2009Fresher by 36 months

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus VR-340

 T900 VR-340 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Display dimension3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution922k460kSharper display (+462k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Sony T900

 VR-340 T900 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-340 comes with exterior dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

See the Olympus VR-340 and Sony T900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the VR-340 and the T900.

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony T900 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-340 and T900 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading through specs. The graphic below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-340 and T900.

All in all, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-340 to give you greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher VR-340 provides an edge in sensor tech.

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography features
Sony T900 Portrait photography features
34
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
27
focusing manually
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Street photography factors
Sony T900 Street photography factors
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (125g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VR-340
Sports photography with Sony T900
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
24
built in image stabilization (Optical)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,000s)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VR-340
Travel photography with Sony T900
69
lighter than average in class (125 grams)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
52
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low megapixels (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VR-340
Landscape photography with Sony T900
43
pretty wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
37
focusing manually
screen larger than average (3.5 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-340 Vlogging info
Sony T900 Vlogging info
33
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
lighter than average in class (125g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone jack
28
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VR-340 vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-340 and Sony T900
 Olympus VR-340Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus VR-340 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Class Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Revealed 2012-01-10 2009-02-17
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-240mm (10.0x) 35-140mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.7 f/3.5-10.0
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3.5"
Display resolution 460k dot 922k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 2s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1000s
Continuous shooting speed - 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.80 m 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125g (0.28 lbs) 143g (0.32 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LI-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $130 $300