Olympus VR-340 vs Sony TX9
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
95 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Revealed July 2010
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony TX9 Overview
The following is a thorough overview of the Olympus VR-340 and Sony TX9, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the VR-340 (16MP) and TX9 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe VR-340 was brought out 19 months after the TX9 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the VR-340 matches up versus the TX9 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony TX9 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-340 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-340 Gallery & Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Sony TX9
VR-340 | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | July 2010 | Newer by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Olympus VR-340
TX9 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Sony TX9
VR-340 | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-340 has got physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sony TX9 has sizing of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VR-340 and Sony TX9 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the VR-340 vs the TX9.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VR-340 and TX9 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-340 and TX9.
As you can see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus VR-340 to give more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern VR-340 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-340 vs Sony TX9 Specifications
Olympus VR-340 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VR-340 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2012-01-10 | 2010-07-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.80 m | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 lb) | 149g (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-50B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $130 | $799 |