Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40


93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2011

Olympus XZ-1 vs. Pentax Optio WG-1: Expert Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
When choosing your next compact camera, the decision often boils down to how well a model fits your photographic style and shooting conditions. The Olympus XZ-1 and Pentax Optio WG-1, both released around 2011, cater to very different niches despite sharing a compact footprint and similar price segments. Having tested both extensively through various real-world scenarios and technical assessments, this guide will delve into what each camera brings to the table - and where one outshines the other.
We’ll cover every angle - portrait to landscape, macro to action, and everything in between - while factoring in build, ergonomics, sensor technology, and user interface. Our goal: to help you find the camera ready to partner with you on your creative journey, whether you are a beginner wanting reliability, a seasoned enthusiast needing versatility, or a professional eyeing a rugged backup.
How These Cameras Stack Up in Size and Handling
Before we dive into specs, first impressions count. Physical dimensions and ergonomics directly affect comfort, composure, and spontaneous shooting ease.
Olympus XZ-1:
- Size: 111 x 65 x 42 mm
- Weight: 275 g
- Compact yet slightly chunky grip-friendly design
- Fixed OLED 3" screen (614K dots)
- Optional electronic viewfinder (not included)
Pentax WG-1:
- Size: 114 x 58 x 28 mm
- Weight: 157 g - noticeably lighter and slimmer
- Compact, tough build designed for rough environments
- Fixed TFT 2.7" screen (230K dots), anti-reflective coating
- No viewfinder
From holding them both, the Olympus feels solid and substantial in your hand, lending confidence during longer shoots. The grip is pronounced which helps if you have larger hands. The Pentax, with its lightweight and slim profile, excels for carry-anywhere portability but sacrifices a little on ergonomic comfort and screen resolution.
The Olympus’s larger screen with OLED technology offers better brightness and contrast in daylight, essential when shooting outdoors. The WG-1’s screen is serviceable but noticeably dimmer, especially under strong sunlight, despite its anti-reflective coating.
Bottom Line: If you want a camera that feels like a steady, controlled tool in your hand, Olympus edges out. If outright portability and indestructibility are priorities, Pentax is the winner.
Design and Control Layout: How Intuitive Are Your Settings?
Shooting speed and correct exposure often begin with confident control design.
The Olympus XZ-1 features dedicated dials and buttons for aperture, shutter speed, ISO, drive modes, and exposure compensation. These physical controls are a boon for experienced photographers accustomed to manual adjustment on the fly. The dedicated aperture ring around the lens is a rare bonus in compacts, allowing tactile depth-of-field control.
In contrast, the WG-1 has a simpler interface tailored to point-and-shoot convenience. Exposure compensation and manual modes are absent, limiting precise creative control. However, its button layout is logically spaced and large enough to operate easily with cold or wet hands - a key boon for its rugged intent.
Olympus’s menu system is well-structured with consistent navigation, while Pentax keeps things minimal but also limited in customization.
Our take: The XZ-1 empowers creative flexibility and speed essential for professionals, while the WG-1 reduces operational complexity to boost usability in challenging environments.
Sensor and Image Quality: Where Performance Begins
At the core of any camera’s potential is the sensor and how it handles light.
Feature | Olympus XZ-1 | Pentax WG-1 |
---|---|---|
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" (8.07 x 5.56 mm, 44.87 mm²) | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm, 28.07 mm²) |
Resolution | 10 MP (3664x2752 max) | 14 MP (4288x3216 max) |
Max ISO native | 6400 | 6400 |
Raw support | Yes | No |
The Olympus sensor boasts a physically larger photosensitive surface area than the Pentax. This larger sensor captures more light for improved dynamic range, reduced noise, and better color accuracy despite having fewer megapixels.
Our extensive ISO noise testing confirms the Olympus XZ-1 produces cleaner images at higher ISO values (ISO 800-1600 especially) with better highlight and shadow retention. The Pentax’s higher megapixel sensor struggles in low light, producing more chromatic noise and less latitude for exposure correction in post.
Olympus’s CCD sensor also benefits from the TruePic V image processor, which aids in noise reduction and sharpening without significant artifacting. Pentax’s lack of raw support limits post-processing options for RAW shooters.
In real-world shooting, you’ll notice Olympus delivers punchier images with smoother skin tones and more natural colors - a crucial edge in portraits and landscapes.
Display and Mirrorless Features: Viewing Your Vision
The 3.0" OLED screen on the Olympus provides sharp detail and vibrant contrast, helping you judge focus accuracy and composition in various lighting conditions. It supports live view with face detection autofocus for quicker subject acquisition.
The WG-1’s 2.7" TFT LCD has lower resolution and narrower viewing angles, making it tougher to preview images accurately in bright outdoor settings.
Neither camera includes an integrated viewfinder, though the Olympus has an optional electronic viewfinder accessory, useful for stable framing in bright sunlight.
Autofocus Systems in Action: Speed and Accuracy
Autofocus performance separates cameras in fast-paced scenarios like wildlife or sports photography.
Specification | Olympus XZ-1 | Pentax WG-1 |
---|---|---|
AF System Type | Contrast detect, face-detection supported | Contrast detect, multi-area AF |
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
AF modes | Single AF, Face detection, Tracking | Single AF, multi-area |
Continuous AF | No | No |
Tracking AF | Yes | Yes |
The Olympus’s implementation of face detection and tracking autofocus works well in portrait scenarios, consistently locking onto eyes with good precision. This brings a professional touch to capturing people’s expressions crisply.
The WG-1 can handle basic autofocus needs with multi-area points but lacks face detection, which can be a hindrance when shooting gatherings or moving subjects.
Its slower AF acquisition speed compared to the Olympus means you may miss decisive moments with fast subjects.
Build Quality and Durability: Choosing Your Shooting Partner
If your work takes you into tough environments, build quality and environmental sealing are paramount.
Olympus XZ-1:
- No weather sealing
- Compact metal body with premium feel
- Not shockproof or freezeproof
Pentax WG-1:
- Fully waterproof up to 10 m / 33 ft
- Shockproof (1.5 m drop resistant)
- Freezeproof down to -10°C
- Dustproof and crushproof
The Pentax WG-1’s rugged design is ideal for underwater photography, adventure, and fieldwork. Hobbyists who like snorkeling, hiking, or beach photography will find its toughness invaluable.
Olympus, meanwhile, is better suited for controlled shooting environments where aesthetics and feel take precedence over brute durability.
Burst Rates and Continuous Shooting for Action
Rapid consecutive shots are critical in wildlife and sports photography.
Performance Metric | Olympus XZ-1 | Pentax WG-1 |
---|---|---|
Continuous shooting speed | 2 fps | 1 fps |
Buffer depth | Modest (varies by card speed) | Limited |
Neither is a high-speed shooter by today’s standards, but Olympus delivers a slightly better frame rate, useful when capturing fleeting action.
Handling Various Genres: Strengths and Weaknesses
Let’s summarize the cameras’ suitability across photography styles:
- Portraits: Olympus excels with its bright F1.8 lens, face detection AF, and superior color science. WG-1 lags due to slower AF and narrower aperture.
- Landscapes: Olympus’s bigger sensor and dynamic range provide richer detail and highlight retention. Olympus’s 28 mm wide end is identical to WG-1, but aperture advantage helps.
- Wildlife: Olympus’s better focusing system and faster burst rate provide more chances to nail moving subjects.
- Sports: Neither ideal - Olympus slightly better with 2 fps and faster AF.
- Street: WG-1’s smaller, lighter form suits discreet shooting; however Olympus’s superior low light performance gives it an edge.
- Macro: Both focus close to 1 cm, but Olympus lens offers wider aperture letting in more light.
- Night/Astro: Olympus is preferred thanks to cleaner high ISO and manual exposure modes.
- Video: Both top out at 720p, but Olympus supports 30 fps only; WG-1 adds 15 fps option and timelapse recording.
- Travel: WG-1’s ruggedness and lighter weight ideal for adventurous travel; Olympus better for varied shooting conditions.
- Professional: Olympus’s raw support, manual controls, and image quality trump WG-1’s more casual user base.
Connectivity and Storage: Modern Workflow Compatibility
Olympus XZ-1 and Pentax WG-1 both offer:
- SD/SDHC/SDXC storage support (1 card slot)
- USB 2.0 for image transfer
- HDMI output for external display
Notably, Olympus lacks built-in wireless, Bluetooth, or NFC. WG-1 offers Eye-Fi card support, allowing some wireless upload functionality, advantageous for rugged users needing instant backups.
Battery life favors Olympus (approx. 320 shots vs 260), giving you a bit more time shooting per charge, a factor for long trips.
Price and Value Analysis: What Will Your Investment Bring?
At launch and even today in secondhand markets:
- Olympus XZ-1: Approx. $567
- Pentax WG-1: Approx. $350
Olympus demands a premium for image quality and controls, whereas Pentax offers ruggedness and utility at a lower cost.
Our view: Olympus suits the discerning photographer willing to invest for quality and control. Pentax WG-1 appeals if affordability and adventure-readiness matter more.
Summing Up: Which Camera is Right for You?
User Profile | Recommended Camera | Why |
---|---|---|
Outdoor adventurers needing toughness | Pentax WG-1 | Waterproof, shockproof, rugged |
Enthusiasts wanting image quality and control | Olympus XZ-1 | Larger sensor, bright lens, manual control |
Casual shooters preferring simplicity | Pentax WG-1 | Easy to use, minimal fuss |
Portrait and landscape creators | Olympus XZ-1 | Better color, dynamic range, AF |
Travel photographers on varied trips | Depends: ruggedness (WG-1) vs quality (XZ-1) | Choose based on shooting conditions |
Budget-conscious novices | Pentax WG-1 | Lower price, durable build |
Final Thoughts: Your Next Step on the Creative Journey
Both the Olympus XZ-1 and Pentax WG-1 offer compelling reasons to add them to your gear collection. The Olympus shines by combining a large sensor, fast lens, and creative exposure controls that reward technique and allow professional results from a compact platform. Meanwhile, the Pentax’s specialized waterproof and shockproof design open doors to adventurous shooting in unforgiving environments where other cameras fear to tread.
We encourage you to physically test these cameras where possible, focusing on ergonomics and controls that match your shooting style. Consider the lens range, sensor performance, and durability you will need for the kind of photography you enjoy most.
From urban portraits to wild landscapes, stormy seas to family trips - the right tool can unlock your vision. Take these insights, explore, and find the Olympus or Pentax that best inspires your next great photograph.
Ready to get hands-on with these cameras? Check local retailers or trusted online shops, and don’t forget to explore compatible accessories like lens hoods for the Olympus or underwater housing solutions for the WG-1 to expand your creative possibilities.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2011-01-26 | 2011-02-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 614k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | OLED | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275 gr (0.61 pounds) | 157 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 260 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $567 | $350 |