Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WG-1 (14MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WG-1 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-1 was manufactured within a month of the WG-1 and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the XZ-1 grades versus the WG-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-1 & Pentax Optio WG-1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Pentax WG-1
| XZ-1 | WG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Olympus XZ-1
| WG-1 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Pentax WG-1
| XZ-1 | WG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | February 2011 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-1 has got outside dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-1 has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the XZ-1 versus the WG-1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and WG-1 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing technical specs. The visual here should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and WG-1.
As you have seen, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-1 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Pentax WG-1 will render extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a little more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-01-26 | 2011-02-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 614k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.90 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 275 gr (0.61 pounds) | 157 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 photographs | 260 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $567 | $350 |