Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus XZ-1 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-1 was brought out 3 years before the WG-3 GPS and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the XZ-1 matches up vs the WG-3 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-1 & Pentax WG-3 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| XZ-1 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Clearer screen (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Olympus XZ-1
| WG-3 GPS | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2013 | January 2011 | More recent by 30 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
| XZ-1 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-1 has outer measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Pentax WG-3 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-1 versus Pentax WG-3 GPS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the XZ-1 against the WG-3 GPS.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and WG-3 GPS is 88 and 90 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specifications. The graphic here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-1 and WG-3 GPS.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The XZ-1 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Pentax WG-3 GPS will deliver more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older XZ-1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus XZ-1 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-01-26 | 2013-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 614k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 275g (0.61 lb) | 238g (0.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $567 | $350 |