Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX1

Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Ricoh CX1 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Released January 2011
Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Released February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview

The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the CX1 (9MP) is very well matched but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and CX1 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The XZ-1 was manufactured 24 months after the CX1 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the XZ-1 scores against the CX1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

				

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh CX1

 XZ-1 CX1 
ReleasedJanuary 2011February 2009Newer by 24 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus XZ-1

 CX1 XZ-1 
Display resolution920k614kCrisper display (+306k dot)

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh CX1

 XZ-1 CX1 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 features physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).

Compare the Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the XZ-1 against the CX1.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and CX1 is 88 and 93 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specifications. The image here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-1 and CX1.

To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-1 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus XZ-1 will give more detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher XZ-1 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography details
Ricoh CX1 Portrait photography details
45
has manual focus
comes with face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.63")
25
manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
low MP (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus XZ-1
Street photography with Ricoh CX1
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/1.63")
heavier than competition (275g)
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh CX1 Sports photography highlights
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
great battery life (320 per charge)
max fps low (2.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.63")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (9 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography details
Ricoh CX1 Travel photography details
62
great battery life (320 per charge)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (275g)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
59
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
low MP (9 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography information
Ricoh CX1 Landscape photography information
54
has manual focus
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
great battery life (320 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.63")
missing Time Lapse function
42
manual focus
really wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
manual exposure not possible
low MP (9 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus XZ-1
Vlogging with Ricoh CX1
31
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic port
heavier than competition (275 grams)
28
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
no microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh CX1
 Olympus XZ-1Ricoh CX1
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus XZ-1 Ricoh CX1
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2011-01-26 2009-02-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic V Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.63" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8.07 x 5.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 44.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 9MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3664 x 2752 3456 x 2592
Highest native ISO 6400 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 28-200mm (7.1x)
Max aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 4.5 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 614k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 275 grams (0.61 pounds) 180 grams (0.40 pounds)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 34 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 18.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 117 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID Li-50B DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $567 $299