Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Launched January 2011
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Launched March 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Below, we are contrasting the Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is fairly similar but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The XZ-1 was released 11 months after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the XZ-1 matches up vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 XZ-1 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
LaunchedJanuary 2011March 2010More modern by 11 months
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus XZ-1

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC XZ-1 
Display resolution920k614kCrisper display (+306k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 XZ-1 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Manual focus  Dial accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurements
Selfie screen  Lack of selfie screen
Touch display  Lack of Touch display
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 enjoys physical dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the XZ-1 vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 88 and 85 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
To sum up, both the cameras posses the exact same megapixel count but not the same sensor sizes. The XZ-1 has got the larger sensor which should make achieving shallow depth of field easier. The fresher XZ-1 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
	
			Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
 Olympus XZ-1 as a Portrait photography camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Portrait photography camera
45
 has manual focus
 provides face detect autofocus
 delivers RAW files
 low MP (10MP)
 sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
36
 you can focus manually
 delivers RAW files
 no liveview feature
 low megapixels (10 megapixels)
 sensor  is very small (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Street Comparison
 Olympus XZ-1 as a Street photography camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
59
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW files
 screen is fixed
 sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
 heavier than others (275g)
65
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW files
 lighter than competition (355g)
 fixed screen
 sensor  is very small (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary
Sports Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography factors
38
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 provides tracking focus
 good battery life (320 per charge)
 very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
 low MP (10MP)
 sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
 lacks phase detect autofocus
25
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview feature
 low fps (2.0 frames per second)
 low megapixels (10MP)
 sensor  is very small (1/1.7")
 does not have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Travel Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography features
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography features
62
 good battery life (320 per charge)
 flash built-in
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 good max aperture (f1.8)
 missing Time Lapse mode
 heavier than others (275 grams)
 low MP (10MP)
 does not have selfie friendly screen
60
 lighter than competition (355g)
 flash built-in
 relatively wide (24mm)
 low megapixels (10MP)
 does not have a selfie friendly display
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Landscape Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography advice
54
 has manual focus
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 good max aperture (f1.8)
 decent sized screen (3 inches)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW files
 good battery life (320 shots)
 cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 low MP (10MP)
 sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
 missing Time Lapse mode
47
 you can focus manually
 relatively wide (24mm)
 pretty good screen size (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW files
 cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview feature
 low megapixels (10MP)
 sensor  is very small (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging factors
31
 reasonably wide (28mm)
 good max aperture (f1.8)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 provides face detect autofocus
 does not have selfie friendly screen
 video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
 missing mic jack
 heavier than others (275g)
28
 relatively wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition (355g)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
 does not have a selfie friendly display
 low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
 does not have microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	

		

			
Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Olympus XZ-1Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus XZ-1 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Type Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2011-01-26 2010-03-18
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic V Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.63" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 8.07 x 5.56mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 44.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Max resolution 3664 x 2752 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
Autofocus touch    
Continuous autofocus    
Single autofocus    
Tracking autofocus    
Selective autofocus    
Center weighted autofocus    
Autofocus multi area    
Autofocus live view    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Number of focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.5 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 614 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Display tech OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 180 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 2.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual mode    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) 4.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash    
AEB    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 275 grams (0.61 lb) 355 grams (0.78 lb)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 34 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 18.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 117 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photographs 410 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail cost $567 $349