Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh PX

Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Ricoh PX front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Released January 2011
Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Released August 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh PX Overview

Here is a in depth overview of the Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh PX, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and PX (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and PX (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The XZ-1 was unveiled 6 months before the PX which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-1 matches up vs the PX with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Ricoh PX

 XZ-1 PX 
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kClearer display (+384k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Olympus XZ-1

 PX XZ-1 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh PX

 XZ-1 PX 
ReleasedJanuary 2011August 2011Similar age
Manual focus More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 offers external measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Ricoh PX has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh PX in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the XZ-1 versus the PX.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh PX size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and PX is 88 and 95 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is tough to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over specs. The graphic below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and PX.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-1 using its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh PX will deliver extra detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a little more aggressively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography info
Ricoh PX Portrait photography info
45
manual focus
supports face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.63")
43
manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
includes face detect focus
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Street photography factors
Ricoh PX Street photography factors
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/1.63")
heavier than competition in class (275 grams)
63
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus XZ-1
Sports photography with Ricoh PX
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
great battery life (320 shots)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.63")
lack of phase detect autofocus
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
weather proof
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Travel photography info
Ricoh PX Travel photography info
62
great battery life (320 CIPA)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (275 grams)
megapixel count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
68
weather proof
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-1
Landscape photography with Ricoh PX
54
manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
great battery life (320 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.63")
lack of Time Lapse recording
47
manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
weather proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging info
Ricoh PX Vlogging info
31
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic support
heavier than competition in class (275g)
31
decently wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus XZ-1 vs Ricoh PX Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Ricoh PX
 Olympus XZ-1Ricoh PX
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus XZ-1 Ricoh PX
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2011-01-26 2011-08-16
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic V Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.63" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8.07 x 5.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 44.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 3664 x 2752 4608 x 3072
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/3.9-5.4
Macro focus range 1cm 3cm
Crop factor 4.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 614 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 275g (0.61 lb) 156g (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 34 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 18.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 117 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model Li-50B DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $567 $329