Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL820
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternative Name is IT100
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL820 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung SL820, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the SL820 (12MP) is very close but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and SL820 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-1 was brought out 24 months after the SL820 making them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the XZ-1 scores versus the SL820 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung SL820. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery and Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Samsung SL820
| XZ-1 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 24 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Olympus XZ-1
| SL820 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung SL820
| XZ-1 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 offers physical measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL820 has sizing of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung SL820 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-1 compared to the SL820.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and SL820 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-1 and SL820.
Clearly, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-1 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Samsung SL820 will result in extra detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher XZ-1 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung SL820 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung SL820 |
| Also called as | - | IT100 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-01-26 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 614k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 275 grams (0.61 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $567 | $280 |