Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f91/52f9140fa7006285dc43ba7d1f1fb45d41f5684b" alt="Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WB35F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The XZ-1 was revealed 3 years prior to the WB35F which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-1 scores versus the WB35F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-1 & Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Samsung WB35F
XZ-1 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus XZ-1
WB35F | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 35 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung WB35F
XZ-1 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-1 has external dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-1 versus the WB35F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f80f/7f80f07d94697280e3c972015f6097d7fe1bc7f9" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and WB35F is 88 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b4d6/8b4d611ac1747536a1fb75e6b08a2c1c23317a1d" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by looking through specifications. The image underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and WB35F.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung WB35F will render more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/017ca/017ca8051a471ee7eb48175b69302e761e4580fe" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eea16/eea164c16c96c09f72458498635bfd5686d7a3f6" alt="Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Samsung WB35F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-01-26 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 614k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 275 grams (0.61 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $567 | $130 |