Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

In this article, we are matching up the Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WB35F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The XZ-1 was revealed 3 years prior to the WB35F which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-1 scores versus the WB35F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Samsung WB35F

 XZ-1 WB35F 
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kSharper display (+384k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus XZ-1

 WB35F XZ-1 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014January 2011More modern by 35 months

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung WB35F

 XZ-1 WB35F 
Manually focus More precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-1 has external dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Compare the Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-1 versus the WB35F.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and WB35F is 88 and 93 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by looking through specifications. The image underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and WB35F.

To sum up, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung WB35F will render more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography highlights
45
focusing manually
has face detect focus
exports RAW files
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.63")
37
manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Street photography advice
Samsung WB35F Street photography advice
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/1.63")
heavier than average in class (275g)
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (194 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography information
Samsung WB35F Sports photography information
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
great battery power (320 shots)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.63")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
40
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus XZ-1
Travel photography with Samsung WB35F
62
great battery power (320 shots)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than average in class (275 grams)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
70
lighter than average in class (194 grams)
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
no Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Landscape photography camera
54
focusing manually
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
great battery power (320 per charge)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.63")
lack of Time Lapse function
43
manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB35F as a Vlogging camera
31
fairly wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic support
heavier than average in class (275 grams)
31
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (194g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus XZ-1 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Samsung WB35F
 Olympus XZ-1Samsung WB35F
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus XZ-1 Samsung WB35F
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2011-01-26 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic V -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.63" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8.07 x 5.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 44.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3664 x 2752 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 11 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Largest aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Crop factor 4.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 614k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 2.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 8.60 m (ISO 800) -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 275 grams (0.61 lbs) 194 grams (0.43 lbs)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 34 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 18.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 117 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID Li-50B BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $567 $130