Clicky

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony S2000

Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41
Olympus XZ-1 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front
Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Sony S2000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
  • Launched January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony S2000 Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony S2000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is pretty close but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and S2000 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The XZ-1 was revealed 13 months later than the S2000 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the XZ-1 matches up against the S2000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony S2000

 XZ-1 S2000 
LaunchedJanuary 2011January 2010More recent by 13 months
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Screen resolution614k230kClearer screen (+384k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus XZ-1

 S2000 XZ-1 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony S2000

 XZ-1 S2000 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 features external dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Sony S2000 has sizing of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony S2000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the XZ-1 and the S2000.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony S2000 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-1 and S2000 is 88 and 93 respectively.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements only by researching specs. The graphic underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-1 and S2000.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit different sensor measurements. The XZ-1 includes the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallower DOF simpler. The newer XZ-1 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography highlights
Sony S2000 Portrait photography highlights
45
manual focus
comes with face detection focusing
supports RAW files
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
19
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Street photography information
Sony S2000 Street photography information
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
more heavy than average in class (275 grams)
46
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography information
Sony S2000 Sports photography information
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
great battery pack (320 shots)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
has no phase detect AF
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,200 seconds)
max frames per second low (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 as a Travel photography camera
Sony S2000 as a Travel photography camera
62
great battery pack (320 shots)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (275g)
megapixel count low (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
50
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse function
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography factors
Sony S2000 Landscape photography factors
54
manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
great battery pack (320 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.63")
doesn't have Timelapse mode
27
screen size is good (3 inches)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging details
Sony S2000 Vlogging details
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone socket
more heavy than average in class (275g)
21
wide angle not good (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony S2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-1 and Sony S2000
 Olympus XZ-1Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus XZ-1 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2011-01-26 2010-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic V Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.63" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8.07 x 5.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 44.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3664 x 2752 3456 x 2592
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 33-105mm (3.2x)
Maximal aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/3.1-5.6
Macro focus distance 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 4.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 614k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 1 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1200 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) 3.30 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 275g (0.61 lb) 167g (0.37 lb)
Dimensions 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 34 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 18.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 117 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model Li-50B 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $567 $225