Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W310
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
96 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-112mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 137g - 95 x 55 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W310 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W310, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the W310 (12MP) is pretty close but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and W310 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-1 was introduced 13 months later than the W310 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony W310 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-1 matches up against the W310 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W310 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Sony W310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony W310
| XZ-1 | W310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 | January 2010 | More recent by 13 months | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W310 over the Olympus XZ-1
| W310 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony W310
| XZ-1 | W310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W310 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-1 provides physical dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Sony W310 has dimensions of 95mm x 55mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W310 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-1 and the W310.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and W310 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W310 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and W310.
Clearly, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The XZ-1 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony W310 will render greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger XZ-1 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W310 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony W310 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2011-01-26 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.0-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 614 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 275g (0.61 lbs) | 137g (0.30 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 95 x 55 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $567 | $150 |