Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony WX220
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
96 Imaging
43 Features
41 Overall
42
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony WX220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2014
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony WX220 Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Olympus XZ-1 versus Sony WX220, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-1 (10MP) and WX220 (18MP) and the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and WX220 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-1 was announced 4 years earlier than the WX220 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the XZ-1 grades versus the WX220 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony WX220 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Sony WX220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony WX220
XZ-1 | WX220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 614k | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Olympus XZ-1
WX220 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | January 2011 | More modern by 37 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony WX220
XZ-1 | WX220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-1 provides exterior dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) whilst the Sony WX220 has dimensions of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-1 versus Sony WX220 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the XZ-1 versus the WX220.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-1 and WX220 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes just by reviewing a spec sheet. The image underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and WX220.
Clearly, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-1 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony WX220 will deliver greater detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged XZ-1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony WX220 Specifications
Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2011-01-26 | 2014-02-12 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.70 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 275 gr (0.61 lbs) | 121 gr (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 34 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 210 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $567 | $198 |