Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-6.4) lens
- 123g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and FH8 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FH8 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was released 12 months later than the FH8 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick overview of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the FH8 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FH8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FH8
| XZ-2 iHS | FH8 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 | January 2012 | Fresher by 12 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH8 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| FH8 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FH8
| XZ-2 iHS | FH8 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic FH8 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 123 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the FH8.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and FH8 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by looking through specs. The graphic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and FH8.
All in all, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic FH8 will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.5-6.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 123g (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | 260 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $450 | $149 |