Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-6.4) lens
- 123g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and FH8 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FH8 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-2 iHS was released 12 months later than the FH8 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick overview of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up versus the FH8 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FH8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FH8
| XZ-2 iHS | FH8 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 | January 2012 | Fresher by 12 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH8 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| FH8 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FH8
| XZ-2 iHS | FH8 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outside dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic FH8 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 123 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the FH8.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and FH8 is 85 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by looking through specs. The graphic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and FH8.
All in all, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic FH8 will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The fresher XZ-2 iHS provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH8 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.5-6.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 123g (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | 260 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $450 | $149 |