Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX48
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
95 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX40
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FX48, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FX48 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FX48 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 3 years after the FX48 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the FX48 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FX48 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FX48
XZ-2 iHS | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | January 2009 | More modern by 48 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FX48 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FX48
XZ-2 iHS | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX48 has sizing of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FX48 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the FX48.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and FX48 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes simply by going through specs. The picture here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and FX48.
All in all, the two cameras provide the same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS features the bigger sensor which will make getting bokeh simpler. The newer XZ-2 iHS will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX48 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FX40 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) | 150 grams (0.33 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $450 | $325 |