Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc5a2/dc5a23e639490cb05b989f13eba4ea99bfc355d5" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 149g - 102 x 56 x 22mm
- Launched August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the FX90 (12MP) is very comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FX90 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was introduced 16 months later than the FX90 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the FX90 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FX90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FX90
XZ-2 iHS | FX90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | ![]() | August 2011 | More recent by 16 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX90 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FX90 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FX90
XZ-2 iHS | FX90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS offers external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic FX90 has proportions of 102mm x 56mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the FX90.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63234/63234d7084afee1dd7add791349a1308d7b99532" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and FX90 is 85 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08f5f/08f5fdbc1c41941421c72d0586c07e25ee9d0d96" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to see the difference in sensor measurements simply by seeing specifications. The photograph here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and FX90.
Plainly, both of these cameras offer the same exact megapixels but not the same sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS includes the larger sensor which will make achieving bokeh less difficult. The fresher XZ-2 iHS is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f206/0f20662a5c3efc64feebafbccc85cea057656fea" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad8d2/ad8d280f578a3e9f175e5ca9663c5c46d1e70063" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FX90 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2011-08-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lb) | 149 grams (0.33 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 102 x 56 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 200 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $450 | $227 |