Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
55 Imaging
50 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Revealed June 2014
- Later Model is Panasonic FZ2500
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FZ1000, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and FZ1000 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FZ1000 (1") posses different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 18 months earlier than the FZ1000 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the FZ1000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FZ1000
| XZ-2 iHS | FZ1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| FZ1000 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2014 | December 2012 | More modern by 18 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ1000
| XZ-2 iHS | FZ1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 has sizing of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") having a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FZ1000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the FZ1000.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and FZ1000 is 85 and 55 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The picture underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and FZ1000.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Panasonic FZ1000 will give you greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2014-06-12 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-4.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 12.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 831 gr (1.83 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 22.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 11.7 |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | 517 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | 360 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | DMW-BLC12PP |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $450 | $800 |