Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Revealed June 2014
- Later Model is Panasonic FZ2500
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FZ1000, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and FZ1000 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and FZ1000 (1") posses different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 18 months earlier than the FZ1000 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the FZ1000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic FZ1000
XZ-2 iHS | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
FZ1000 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2014 | December 2012 | More modern by 18 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ1000
XZ-2 iHS | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 has sizing of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") having a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic FZ1000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the FZ1000.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and FZ1000 is 85 and 55 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The picture underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and FZ1000.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Panasonic FZ1000 will give you greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2014-06-12 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 831 gr (1.83 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 11.7 |
DXO Low light score | 216 | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 360 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $450 | $800 |