Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS3
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49


92 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 197g - 103 x 64 x 27mm
- Revealed August 2011
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FT3
- Earlier Model is Panasonic TS2
- Later Model is Panasonic TS4

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS3 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the TS3 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and TS3 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.

The XZ-2 iHS was revealed 17 months later than the TS3 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the TS3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic TS3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic TS3
XZ-2 iHS | TS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | ![]() | August 2011 | More recent by 17 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS3 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TS3 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic TS3
XZ-2 iHS | TS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Panasonic TS3 has proportions of 103mm x 64mm x 27mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 197 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the TS3.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and TS3 is 85 and 92 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and TS3.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer the same exact MP albeit different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS has the bigger sensor which should make achieving bokeh simpler. The newer XZ-2 iHS should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS3 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic TS3 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FT3 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 197 gr (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 103 x 64 x 27mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 310 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $450 | $380 |