Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS15
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 208g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Launched June 2012
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ25
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS20
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS15 Overview
Here is a extended analysis of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic ZS15, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the ZS15 (12MP) is very comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and ZS15 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-2 iHS was released 6 months later than the ZS15 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the ZS15 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS15 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Panasonic ZS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic ZS15
| XZ-2 iHS | ZS15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS15 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| ZS15 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic ZS15
| XZ-2 iHS | ZS15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2012 | June 2012 | Same age | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS15 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS15 has specifications of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic ZS15 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the ZS15.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and ZS15 is 85 and 92 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS15 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing simply by seeing specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and ZS15.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature the identical MP but not the same sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS has got the larger sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF simpler.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS15 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic ZS15 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 |
| Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ25 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-12-18 | 2012-06-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 15s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 6.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | 260 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $450 | $279 |