Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E90
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
94 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-95mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 145g - 102 x 59 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E90 Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax E90, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E90 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and E90 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 2 years later than the E90 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the E90 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E90 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax Optio E90. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax E90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax E90
| XZ-2 iHS | E90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 36 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax E90 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| E90 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax E90
| XZ-2 iHS | E90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E90 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with outer dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Pentax E90 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax E90 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the E90.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and E90 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E90 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing just by going through specs. The photograph underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and E90.
All in all, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will produce more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The newer XZ-2 iHS should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E90 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax E90 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio E90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio E90 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-12-18 | 2010-01-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Prime |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 32-95mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 lbs) | 145g (0.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 102 x 59 x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $450 | $100 |
