Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax P80
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
95 Imaging
34 Features
23 Overall
29
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax P80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-110mm (F2.6-5.8) lens
- 125g - 102 x 59 x 25mm
- Announced August 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax P80 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax P80, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the P80 (12MP) is fairly comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and P80 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 3 years later than the P80 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a quick summation of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the P80 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax P80 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax Optio P80. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax P80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax P80
| XZ-2 iHS | P80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2012 | August 2009 | More recent by 42 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax P80 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| P80 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax P80
| XZ-2 iHS | P80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax P80 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Pentax P80 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax P80 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the P80.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and P80 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax P80 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by going through specs. The photograph here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and P80.
All in all, both of these cameras have the same megapixel count but different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS comes with the larger sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler. The more recent XZ-2 iHS provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax P80 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax P80 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio P80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio P80 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2009-08-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Prime |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-110mm (3.9x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.6-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 102 x 59 x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $450 | $200 |