Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RZ18
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
92 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RZ18 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Announced September 2011
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RZ18 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax RZ18, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and RZ18 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and RZ18 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-2 iHS was launched 16 months after the RZ18 making them a generation away from each other. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the RZ18 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RZ18 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax Optio RZ18. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax RZ18 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax RZ18
XZ-2 iHS | RZ18 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | September 2011 | Newer by 16 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ18 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
RZ18 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax RZ18
XZ-2 iHS | RZ18 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RZ18 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got outer dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Pentax RZ18 has sizing of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax RZ18 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the RZ18.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and RZ18 is 85 and 92 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RZ18 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through specifications. The pic below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and RZ18.
Plainly, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Pentax RZ18 will render extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer XZ-2 iHS should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RZ18 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax RZ18 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio RZ18 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio RZ18 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2011-09-12 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 4cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 2.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 178 gr (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $450 | $210 |