Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63bd5/63bd549202ff236b9bc86cddba608e6a029457e0" alt="Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview
The following is a extended review of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the WG-1 GPS (14MP) is very comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-1 GPS (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was introduced 17 months after the WG-1 GPS making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the WG-1 GPS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
XZ-2 iHS | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | ![]() | August 2011 | Newer by 17 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
WG-1 GPS | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax WG-1 GPS
XZ-2 iHS | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has got exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Pentax WG-1 GPS has sizing of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the WG-1 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/616f3/616f35b798ec218278cc0f765e8694b0259540b5" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-1 GPS is 85 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e37e/7e37e9cbbb24db9498127599d3c3d97a03febbd9" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specifications. The pic here may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-1 GPS.
To sum up, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS having a larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Pentax WG-1 GPS will show extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer XZ-2 iHS will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/388c8/388c865d9b76ee6f4cea330deede7c93ab31c1f0" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39610/39610dde89e5c9b66594a87d3072f9a81a5c07c6" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lb) | 167 grams (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 260 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $450 | $350 |