Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd313/dd313ff47bd137e5fd5d7c986ffd7f948ade844f" alt="Pentax Q front Pentax Q front"
93 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 180g - 98 x 57 x 31mm
- Launched June 2011
- New Model is Pentax Q10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax Q, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the Q (12MP) is relatively well matched but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and Q (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was manufactured 19 months later than the Q which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the Q in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Pentax Q. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Pentax Q Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Pentax Q
XZ-2 iHS | Q | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | ![]() | June 2011 | More recent by 19 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Q | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Pentax Q
XZ-2 iHS | Q | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides outer dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Pentax Q has specifications of 98mm x 57mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Pentax Q in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the Q.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93966/93966171e8ec4c0e507236ebe7ae072970acfacf" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and Q is 85 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f302d/f302dfea8481e77696443f8447a594c4bcbd5e43" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking technical specs. The photograph below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-2 iHS and Q.
As you have seen, each of the cameras posses the exact same megapixels albeit different sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS uses the bigger sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field simpler. The fresher XZ-2 iHS provides an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bf42/5bf4242aae3d1f1407a45af35b787a0342cbe418" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2a52/a2a524f0a0a7114be30f283eb0425362e892a3b5" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Pentax Q Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Q | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Pentax Q |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2011-06-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 8 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 5.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Trailing-curtain sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 180 gr (0.40 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 98 x 57 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 49 | 47 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | 20.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 11.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | 189 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 230 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $450 | $695 |