Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49


92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2010

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh CX4, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is fairly similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and CX4 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.

The XZ-2 iHS was released 2 years after the CX4 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the CX4 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh CX4. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh CX4
XZ-2 iHS | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | ![]() | August 2010 | More modern by 29 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
CX4 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh CX4
XZ-2 iHS | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides external measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Ricoh CX4 has measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh CX4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the CX4.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and CX4 is 85 and 92 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading technical specs. The picture underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and CX4.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos more aggressively. The more recent XZ-2 iHS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh CX4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh CX4 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-12-18 | 2010-08-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-90B | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $450 | $211 |