Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX5
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh CX5, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the CX5 (10MP) is fairly similar but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and CX5 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was unveiled 18 months later than the CX5 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS grades versus the CX5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Ricoh CX5. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh CX5
| XZ-2 iHS | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 | July 2011 | Fresher by 18 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| CX5 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh CX5
| XZ-2 iHS | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 920k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Ricoh CX5 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Ricoh CX5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the CX5.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and CX5 is 85 and 92 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by reviewing specs. The visual underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and CX5.
All in all, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS using its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will offer you more detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The more recent XZ-2 iHS will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh CX5 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 205g (0.45 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $450 | $399 |