Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30W
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
91 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30W, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-30W (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and WG-30W (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was released 22 months earlier than the WG-30W making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the WG-30W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-30W. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-30W
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| WG-30W | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2014 | December 2012 | Fresher by 22 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-30W
| XZ-2 iHS | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS enjoys physical measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30W has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30W in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the WG-30W.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and WG-30W is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at specs. The visual underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and WG-30W.
All in all, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-2 iHS featuring a larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh WG-30W will give greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-12-18 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346g (0.76 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $450 | $280 |